If you run a small AV company — one to five people — and you are weighing up Rentman, the honest starting point is that Rentman is very good software, and probably more software than you need today. It is built to solve the operational problem of a rental business at scale: where every case of equipment is, who has it, when it comes back, and what it is worth. If that is your daily pain, stop reading and go buy it. This article is for the smaller operator whose actual bottleneck sits somewhere else.
Rentman earned its position in the European AV market by taking equipment operations seriously. Barcode and QR tracking on individual assets, warehouse workflows, crew scheduling, subhire management, availability across overlapping jobs — these are genuinely hard problems and Rentman solves them properly. For a company running a warehouse of thousands of items and a crew of twenty, that infrastructure pays for itself quickly, and there is no serious argument for replacing it.
The friction for small teams is the pricing model rather than the product. Rentman charges per user, from roughly 14 euros per user per month at entry level up to around 39 euros per user per month for the full feature set. For a three-person company that is somewhere between 42 and 117 euros a month; for five people, 70 to 195. That is fair value for warehouse infrastructure — but you pay it per seat whether or not the person in that seat ever touches the warehouse features.
So the question that actually decides this is not which platform is better. It is which bottleneck is costing you more money this quarter. If jobs go out with missing gear, if you double-book equipment, if you cannot say what is in the van without walking to it — that is an operations problem and you need operations software. If your inventory fits in your head and your real problem is that quoting a job takes three hours you do not have, that is a proposal problem, and operations software will not fix it.
Small AV companies lose more deals to proposal latency than to warehouse chaos. The client emails on Tuesday, three suppliers get asked, and whoever answers first with something that looks professional shapes the decision. If you are quoting in the evening after site visits, you are routinely the third response — and by then the brief has been anchored by somebody else's document.
Ready to create proposals in minutes?
CueQuote generates professional event proposals with AI. Start free, no credit card required.
Try CueQuote Free →A proposal-first alternative attacks that specific problem. CueQuote is flat-rate rather than per user — 29 euros a month for Starter, 79 for Pro, excluding VAT — and the core of it is that you describe the event in plain language and get back a structured equipment list, priced from your own catalogue, in a couple of minutes rather than a couple of hours. Everything after that is editing rather than authoring, which is a fundamentally cheaper task.
For a three-person company the arithmetic is stark. Rentman across three seats runs 42 to 117 euros a month. CueQuote Starter is 29 euros a month for the company rather than the seat, and Pro is 79. If only one or two people ever write proposals, per-seat pricing charges you for a shape of business you do not have yet.
Be clear about what you give up. CueQuote does not track equipment with barcodes, does not manage a warehouse, does not schedule crew across overlapping jobs, and does not handle subhire. If you need those things you need Rentman or something like it, and no amount of proposal speed compensates. Choosing a proposal-first tool is a statement that your inventory is still small enough to manage without software — true for a lot of small AV companies, and it stops being true as you grow.
The two are not mutually exclusive either. Plenty of companies run operations software for the warehouse and something faster at the front end, because the tools optimise for different moments in the job. The expensive mistake is paying for a full operations platform per seat and then still writing proposals by hand in a word processor — that is the worst of both.
The practical way to decide takes about a week. Count the proposals you sent last month and the hours they took. Count the jobs where equipment problems cost you money. Whichever number is bigger is the software you should buy first. Both platforms have free entry points, so this is a question you can answer with evidence rather than opinion.